The Bechdel Test Is Stupid

the short storyAdd this to the list of sentences I never thought I’d say: A cross dressing pirate and a sadistic queen made me reconsider one way we assess the gender diversity in fictional works.

the long storyI recently finished A Darker Shade of Magic by V.E. Schwab, and I have to say, I’m quite impressed with the characters Lila and Astrid. They are strong, independent characters who just so happen to be women. And I love strong female characters.

And yet, I’m pretty sure A Darker Shade of Magic fails the Bechdel test.

The Bechdel test challenges the sexism in any fictional work and has three basic rules:

  1. There must be at least two female characters.
  2. They must meet and have a conversation.
  3. They must discuss something other than a man.

Lots of works pass rules one and two no problem. The tricky bit is rule three.

Take A Darker Shade of Magic, for instance. Lila and Astrid exist (check),  meet on two occassions, and converse at both (check).

But what do they converse about? The protagonist, a man named Kell.

The first time they converse, Astrid is possessing a body that is attacking Kell, and so Lila arrives to rescue him.

If that isn’t a gender role reversal I don’t know what is. A woman, a seemingly mundane woman, coming to the rescue of a powerful man, who is held hostage by a power-hungry and vicious woman.

And yet, because they talk about Kell, they fail the Bechdel test.

Which is why it’s so stupid.

The Bechdel test fails to assess the context of the conversation between the two women in question. What if the women are talking about gender inequality in the workplace? What if the women were talking about a male romantic interest five pages ago and now the conversation has moved on to food or shoes or hiking or literally anything that isn’t a male human? What if they are talking about a male fictional character (say, Cath talking to Wren about Simon Snow in Fangirl)? Can they never talk about men ever? How realistic is that?

I’d also like to gently remind users of the Bechdel test that men make up half of the population…they are bound to come up in conversation.

I think I’ve always had this problem with the Bechdel test, ever since I heard about it in this TED talk:

I like a lot of things in this TED talk, particularly the emphasis of gendered character archetypes. I like that he recognizes that the hero’s journey is often a violent process that celebrates the special-ness of the chosen one…who usually happens to be male.

But I think he makes a slip when he discusses rule 3. He say, “Do they talk about something other than the guy that they are both in love with?”

I don’t see where the Bechdel test specifies this. But I think we can come up with something more sophisticated than this. Because feminism, while being a simple request, is all about context. When we talk about feminism, we talk about equal opportunities regardless of gender. But those opportunities vary depending on what situation a person is in.

And just like in books, in life, context is everything.

3 thoughts on “The Bechdel Test Is Stupid”

  1. I love this post! This is so true. Sadly the video doesn’t show up so I can’t watch it, but you’re completely right. It’s all about context. What if the women are talking about the presidential candidates? What if they’re talking about a male family member or a mutual friend? Or like you said, a fictional character? It’s just completely unrealistic.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m glad you agree. When I first heard about the Bechdel Test I thought it was brilliant. Then I kept finding holes in it. I hope you were able to watch the video, it’s quite good.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I like that the Bechdel Test highlights the fact that there is more in women’s lives than men — as a woman who works in a female dominated workplace, I can go a long time without talking about a *specific* man while still talking about gender inequality (that’s actually the type of law I practice) — but it is too simple. I agree with you that context matters.


Make the story even longer with a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s