Review | Frankenstein by Mary Shelly

There is this great post on tumblr, (and while I can’t seem to find it, it basically says this):

Being smart is knowing Frankenstein isn’t the monster.

Being wise is knowing Frankenstein is the monster.



Victor Frankenstein is fascinated by science. After extensive research, he discovers the secret to life, and constructs a humanoid body out of corpses, designed to be a perfect being.

But when the monster wakes up, Frankenstein is horrified and runs away. The monster escapes and discovers the world, only to find that he is alone. He demands Frankenstein build him a partner, but Frankenstein destroys the female in fear. The monster then vows vengeance on his creator, making sure Victor will understand the despair he’s experienced.


Where to begin with this book? It just covers so much in such little space.

The plot is one of genius, and it’s amazing to think that teenage Mary Shelley thought it (most) up for a story-telling contest during her vacation in Geneva.

First thing’s first: this story is a frame story, which means there’s a whole lot of skepticism at to whether or not any of this is true. Is Victor telling the truth? is Walton telling the truth? What if Walton made everything up? The air of ambiguity doesn’t tear from the story though, because you learn soon enough that it doesn’t matter if it was real, it matters that it happened.

Second, it’s just so well pieced together. Sure, there are parts where you think, “Really? How convenient is that?” But when you look back at the story, it seems almost fated that the lives of Victor and the monster are twisted together, as if the creator and the created are irreversibly tied together. My favourite part has to be when the monster tells his story, because understanding sensations that seem so mundane to us put a new perspective of what it means to be.

I can’t say too much of the plot without spoiling, so I’ll move on to the characters.

Victor Frankenstein is the most pretentious, arrogant, ambitious, selfish douche in literature. He’s also a genius. And stubbornly static in terms of character development. You can’t really admire the guy, since he broke laws of nature, morality, religion, and so forth, but on some levels you can identify and sympathize with him. As his loved ones fall around him, you do feel bad for him. And who hasn’t wanted something so bad, they didn’t care about the consequences, at least to some extent?

For example, there’s Walton, the first layer of the frame story. He’s the narrator who’s main character trait is that he’s just as ambitious as Frankenstein was, hoping to explore the Arctic Circle, which is where he finds Victor.

The side characters are pretty static—almost interchangeable by name. Victor’s friends and family—Clerval, Elizabeth, his father—all share similar sentiments towards him and most of what we know is that they worry about him constantly. All the female characters are pretty much sticks, and men don’t amount to much either.

The monster, though, is the most complex character, and the best to analyze. Is he human? Is he something else? Is he intrinsically evil? The struggles of puzzling this out for both the monster and the reader make it easy to identify with him.

And that’s what makes this book so great: there is the constant question of “Who’s responsible for this?”

Is it Frankenstein’s fault that his family is murdered? Is it the monster’s because he’s technically a sentient being? Is society wrong by excluding the monster based on mere appearances? Is science wrong for making discoveries?

Shelley weaves these questions so subtly into the plot, that you know they are there without having them shoved in your face. And the answers to these questions aren’t black and white (though Victor, stubbornly, thinks that they are). In the end though, the answer seems to be morality. Science is good, when it stays within moral limits. The monster becomes a monster when he kills intentionally. Victor is cruel, because he does not act like the creator he is supposed to.

The answer, of course, isn’t that simple, and I could go on and on about this novel for (probably) ever.

Recommendation: Bookmarked For Life. I adore Frankenstein. Read it, and wonder what constitutes a human.


5 thoughts on “Review | Frankenstein by Mary Shelly”

  1. Great review!
    Skipped parts of it because I don’t wanna be spoiled.
    I watched the first few episodes of Frankenstein M.D. and decided to read the book, but haven’t gotten around to it yet because I’m /still/ reading The Giver quartet- another of your recommendations.
    Also, I’m not sure I’ll understand parts of this book since it’s all science-y.
    And truth be told, I don’t understand much of what happens in the vlogseries.

    Do you think I should still read it?

    Also, this description reminded me of Sherlock: Victor Frankenstein is the most pretentious, arrogant, ambitious, selfish douche in literature. He’s also a genius.

    Haha! 😀


    1. How do you like The Giver? I haven’t actually read the fourth one yet, I just know that it exists.

      As for Frankenstein, it’s not so much about the science stuff as it is the morals behind it. Nothing is really explained in scientific terms, so long as you know science has a role in the grand scheme of things.

      I definitely think you should read it though.

      And Frankenstein as Sherlock? I think Frankenstein is more of a jerk, but you can tell me what you think after you read the book 😉


    2. Oh I love The Giver and the rest of the books too (well, except the second half of the last one- I haven’t read it yet).
      It is actually one of those different book series I’ve read. While as a genre it’d probably be YA dystopian or something, it is still something new.
      And it really makes you think, about everything. Well that book made me thankful for colors (now that’s something isn’t it?) which have simply existed for us, we take them for granted.

      Well, I’ll definitely read Frankenstein now, I’m alright with a little bit of science and stuff I can actually understand (I did study the subject for 8 years of my life) but the vlogseries is full of scientific jargon.
      I guess Hank (and the other creators of the show) have purposefully done it for the scientific Nerdfighters who love that kind of thing.
      Like how I love it when John/ Hank do a grammar joke. 😛


    3. Haha well the problem really isnt science jargon, but victorian syntax. Either way, its still really good!
      And I like the grammar jokes too!


    4. Hehe ikr?!?
      Hank and John both know exactly what nerds like (being nerds themselves). 😛

      By the way, check your Facebook if you haven’t today.
      Left a (pretty long) message for you.


Make the story even longer with a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s